Four CD-based DICOM viewers from eFilm, Philips, Pacsgear Gearview, and iSite were examed on two radiology PACS workstations, a standard desktop computer, and a laptop using a test case consisting of a multi-series CTA with 13 series and 3,035 total images. To assist in making a standardized choice for our institution, we chose four common viewers, benchmarked on four different workstations reflecting the variety of environments used by non-radiologist clinicians who would receive a CD.
Numerous PACS viewer options are available, often without empirical data to guide in choosing one for routine use. However, to be useful, this tool should be reliable, robust, and convenient. Providing patients and clinicians with self-contained PACS viewer on CD format is a common and necessary tool to share vital imaging data.
0 kommentar(er)
